The security and deterrence policy of the Baltic states in 2014-2024
 
More details
Hide details
1
Katedra nauk politycznych, Politychnika Koszalińska, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2024-03-19
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-04-23
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-06-26
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-07-22
 
 
Publication date: 2024-07-22
 
 
Corresponding author
Martinas - Malużinas   

Katedra nauk politycznych, Politychnika Koszalińska, Ul. Kwiatkowskiego 6c/4, 75-343, Koszalin, Poland
 
 
Przegląd Nauk o Obronności 2024;(19):59-69
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The full-scale annexation of Crimea and Russia's invasion of Ukraine prompted the political elites of the Baltic states to devote even more attention to security problems and to update the defence plans of the Baltic region. The aim of the work is to analyze the development of the security and deterrence strategies of the Baltic states in the years 2014-2024 in the face of potential Russian threats on the border of the eastern flank of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The starting point for the discussion is the hypothesis that the sense of threat from the Russian Federation contributes to the intensification of trilateral military cooperation between Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. The theoretical basis for the empirical analysis is the adaptive strategy model (so-called grand strategy ) developed by Colin Dueck .

Methods:
case study

Results:
After the annexation of Crimea and the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Baltic states were encouraged to tighten strategic trilateral cooperation and develop the potential of their armed forces to increase the ability to defend their own territory, while striving to strengthen collective defence and deterrence within NATO.

Conclusions:
The Russian invasion of Ukraine resulted in active investment in defense in the Baltic states. In Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, there is currently strong political will to continuously develop military potential, combined with increased public interest in state security issues.

 
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Chmielewski, B. Tarociński J. (2023). ‘The Baltic states and Finland are separating themselves from Russia and Belarus’. Center for Eastern Studies. Available at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publ....
 
2.
Dueck, C. (2005). ‘Realism, Culture and Grand Strategy: Explaining America's Peculiar Path to World Power’, Security Sudies 14(2), pp. 195–231.
 
3.
Gritėnas, T. (2017). Lietuvos ir Estijos santykiai: nuo išvadinimo kvailiais iki bender grėsmių ir sprendimų. Available at: https://www.15min.lt/naujiena/....
 
4.
Gudavičius, S. (2017). ‘Pradedama statistics tvora pasienyje su Kaliningrado sritimi’, Verslo žinios. Available at: https://www.vz.lt/verslo-aplin....
 
5.
Janeliūnas, T. (2021). ‘Changes and adjustment in the foreign policy of Lithuania during Dalia Grybauskaitė's presidency’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 52:2, pp. 221–244. Doi: 10.1080/01629778.2021.1876120.
 
6.
Freedman, L. (2021). ‘Introduction—The Evolution of Deterrence Strategy and Research’. In: Osinga , F., Sweijs , T. (ed.) NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2020. NL ARMS. TMC Asser Press, The Hague. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6265-419-8_1 .
 
7.
Kojala, L., Ivanauskas V. (2014). ‘Lithuanian Eastern Policy 2004–2014: The Role Theory Approach’, Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, No. 32, pp. 49–72.
 
8.
Kuczyńska-Zonik, A. (2023). ‘Non-military potential and readiness of societies for national defense in the Baltic states’, Institute of Central Europe, IEŚ Comments 824. Available at: https://ies.lublin.pl/komentar... -for- national-defense-in-the-Baltic-states/ .
 
9.
Kuczyńska-Zonik, A. (2017). ‘Dylematy bezpieczeństwa państw bałtyckich po aneksji Krymu’. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne nr 2, pp. 125-142. Doi: 10.14746/ssp.2017.2.7.
 
10.
Malużinas, M. (2023a). ‘The Role of Small States in Promoting International Security: Lithuania Strategy’, Review Strategic, no. 16. pp. 155-166. doi: 10.14746/ps.2023.1.11.
 
11.
Malużinas, M. (2023b). ‘Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda's Central and Eastern European foreign policy in 2019-2022: continuation or change?’, Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, no. 1, pp.153-172. doi: 10.47459/lasr.2023.20.7.
 
12.
Malužinas, M. (2022c). ‘Foreign policy of the President of Lithuania – Ginatautas Nausėdy in 2019–2022. Continuation or change?’, Central European Political Studies, (4), 65–96. Doi: 10.14746/ssp.2022.4.4.
 
13.
Szymański P. (2015). ‘Between continuation and adaptation: security policy and armed forces of the Baltic states’. Center for Eastern Studies. Available at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publ....
 
14.
Terlikowski M., Dyner AM (2023). Belarusian vector of the Russian threat to NATO. Available at: https://pism.pl/publikacje/bia... .
 
15.
Vilson M. (2015). ‘The Foreign Policy of the Baltic States and the Ukrainian Crisis: A Case of Europeanization?’. New Perspectives. 23, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/233682... DOI: https:/ /doi.org/10.1177/2336825X1502300203.
 
eISSN:2719-6763
ISSN:2450-6869
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top