Objectives: The aim of this article is to analyse the determinants of changes in the foreign and security policy of the Republic of Finland and to answer the question of how this country's accession to NATO influenced the balance of power and the security environment in Northern Europe. The results of these analyses will allow us to understand how small states can shape the security environment at both the micro, meso, and macro scale.
Methods: Due to Finland's geographical location and its experience in relations with Russia (later the USSR and again with Russia), the article uses a historical and polemological approach. The methodology was supplemented with systemic, quantitative and comparative research.
Results: Finland's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization finally ended its long-standing policy of military non-alignment. Not only the European, but the global security map has changed. There are no longer democratic countries on the map of Europe that border directly on Russia and do not belong to Western military structures. From the Alliance's point of view, Finland's accession is an added value, and this country's greatest advantage is its knowledge and experience in dealing with Russia.
Conclusions: In today's security environment, there is no longer room for either neutrality or military non-engagement. Future research on this issue should approach it in a holistic way, treating the security environment as the sum of military and digital security. Although these two aspects are intertwined, it should not be forgotten that activities in each of them can take place independently.
REFERENCES(43)
1.
Arter, D. (2023). From Finlandisation and post-Finlandisation to the end of Finlandisation? Finland’s road to a NATO application. European security, 32(2), pp. 171-189.
Forsberg T.,Pesu M. (2016). The “Finlandisation” of Finland: The Ideal Type, the Historical Model, and the Lessons Learnt. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 27(3), pp. 473-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/095922....
Gricius, G., Fakhoury, R. (2024). Security for the small: materializing securitization in Finland and Norway. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, pp. 1-15.
Häkkinen, T., Kaarkoski, M. (2024). Willingness to defend and foreign policy in Sweden and Finland from the early Cold War period to the 2010s. Scandinavian Journal of History, pp. 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/034687....
Haugevik, K., Svendsen, Ø., Creutz, K., Olesen, M. R., Regnér, A. L., Schmidt, J. L. (2021). Nordic partnership choices in a fierier security environment: Towards more alignment. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Jonas, M. (2023). Intermediary Bodies in International Politics: Conceptual and Historical Observations on Northern Europe’s Small States in the International System in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Diplomatica, 5(2), pp. 204-224.
Juonala, J. (2022). Näin Suomi varautui Neuvostoliiton yllätys¬iskuun – puolustusvoimien salaiset suunnitelmat paljastavat. Ilta Sanomat. Available at: https://www.is.fi/kotimaa/art-....
Kaczmarek, K. (2019). Zapobieganie zagrożeniom cyfrowym na przykładzie Republiki Estońskiej i Republiki Finlandii. Cybersecurity and Law, 1(1), pp. 143-157.
Kaczmarek, K. (2020). Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne państwa w obliczu pandemii COVID-19 na przykładzie Republiki Finlandii. Cybersecurity and Law, 3(1), pp. 175-190.
Kaczmarek, K. (2023). Finland in the light of cyber threats in the context of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. Cybersecurity and Law, 9(1), pp. 204-214.
Kari, M. J., Hellgren, R. (2021). Case study: Finland as a Target of Russian Information Influence, in: Ilmonen,K., Moilanen, P. (eds) The Political Analyst's Field Guide to Finland. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. JYU Reports, 10. pp. 155-172. https://doi.org/10.17011/jyure....
Karpiuk M., Pizło,W., Kaczmarek, K. (2023). Cybersecurity Management – Current State and Directions of Change. International Journal of Legal Studies, 14(2), pp. 645-663.
Koskimaa, V., Raunio, T. (2024). Effective and democratic policymaking during a major crisis: an in-depth analysis of Finland’s decision to apply for NATO membership after Russia attacked Ukraine. Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 1-24.
Martin, Y. K. (2024). Goodbye to Russia, Russia and Russia!: Finland’s New NATO Chapter Within the Framework of Shelter Theory. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, pp. 1-18.
Partacz, C. (2022). Polityczno-historyczne determinanty europejskiej polityki zagranicznej Republiki Finlandii. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, 16, pp. 153-168.
Pesu, M., Iso-Markku, T. (2024). Insufficiency of informal alignment: why did Finland choose formal NATO membership?. International Affairs, 100(2), pp. 569-588.
Spolander, E. (2023). Turvassa365-podcast: Onko meillä jäänyt etuovi auki? Suomi vakoilun ja vaikuttamisen kohteena. Erillisverkot. Available at: https://www.erillisverkot.fi/t....
Szacawa, D. (2023). Polityki bezpieczeństwa Finlandii i Szwecji: przewrót kopernikański w regionie Morza Bałtyckiego po inwazji Rosji na Ukrainę. Lublin: Instytut Europy Środkowej.
Szacawa, D. (2024). Bezpieczeństwo kompleksowe Finlandii: znaczenie odporności społeczeństwa. Instytut Europy Środkowej 1045(21). Available at: https://ies.lublin.pl/komentar....
Tomz, M., Weeks, J. L., Bansak, K. (2023). How membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization transforms public support for war. PNAS nexus, 2(7), pgad206.
Yle (2022). Ylen kysely: Nato-jäsenyydellä on suomalaisten vankka tuki – 76 prosenttia haluaa Suomen Natoon. Available at: https://yle.fi/a/3-12436782.
Zetterberg, S. (2017). Main outlines of Finnish history. Swedish, Russian and independent eras in a nutshell. Available at: https://finland.fi/life-societ....
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.